Re: would X*Press be upset if...

Bill Fenner (fenner@jazz.psu.edu)
Tue, 9 Jun 92 15:39:01 EDT

Brian Smithson writes:
>
>If X*Press makes a
>significant portion of its revenue from enhanced services, then by keeping
>their datastream format private and discouraging independent development,
>they can exercise some control over the enhanced services market.

Yes, but reverse-engineering the data would not be horribly difficult,
especially having a program available that can (a) give you hints as to
what a particular data is and (b) act as a test suite for your idea of how
the protocol worked.

If the extended services are there and simply not accessible from the basic
software, then I don't see how X*Press can claim that they're extended
services. If they're encrypted, that's another thing, but I don't see any
reason for someone not to figure out the protocol and write a nice interface.
After all, if you were desperate you could just fire up a terminal program
and get the raw data and try to interpret it...

In any case, I'm not sure what the best course of action is. Because of the
non-disclosure agreement that was signed for my developer's guide, I don't
think I can participate in a netwide development effort, even though the
agreement is in questionable legal standing. Even giving 'hints' to other
developers might put me on shaky moral ground... I wish I had the actual
document that was signed, but I think that got lost years ago.

-- 
Bill Fenner	fenner@jazz.psu.edu	..psuvax1!hogbbs!wcfpc!wcf
		wcf@hogbbs.scol.pa.us   (+1 814 238-9633 v.32bis)