I agree. This would create some confusing behaviour I think. When I set a
property, I want it set to that value, and not suddenly change on me.
It would be very confusing if I set a field property value to the same
thing as the card, not realizing I had done so, and then went back and
changed the card property.
>
> or do you have to set the property to empty to resume
> inheriting?
>
>> That's the more general behavior.
>
This to me makes much more sense.
-Earle
lowee@cpsc.ucalgary.ca
The University of Calgary